Tuesday 25 December 2007

GREEN 'MURDER' ACQUITTAL

Although this happened a couple of weeks ago, it does need some comment.


See the BBC link giving a brief description:-

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/south_west/7144379.stm

You can also find other related links to this story in 'The Western Telegraph' & 'The Western Mail'.


I have something of a personal interest in the proceedings as, if you're familiar with the theory of Stanley Milgram entitled 'Six Degrees of Separation', I am acquainted with the youth who struck the allegedly fatal blow and I was also acquainted with the deceased.


The deceased man, Paul Roberts, nicknamed smurf, was known to me personally, he had been a customer of mine in the past and we would pass the 'time of day' if encountering one another in the street etc.


As for the youth who was accused of striking Mr Roberts, he comes from decent enough parents who contribute to society by going out to work each day. Now this youth left school at 16 with little or no qualifications and consequently no prospects. He is the type that will either be lucky and find regular employment, or he will fall by the wayside and end up criminalised like so many of today's youngsters, he may even be 'known' to Police.


When I initially learned of this incident, it was being touted as the callous and cold blooded murder of an innocent man who was walking home after a night out, being set upon by two yobbos and beaten insensible, resulting in death some days later.*1

This 'version' didn't tally with the press reposts that emerged in the week that followed, which alleged that some altercation had taken place and that the victim had been felled by just one or two blows.

My wife, by accident, encountered the parents of the youth known to me in early November and they gave a slightly different version of events, which it appears was the truth. The parents of the youth charged with murder suggested to my spouse that the two youths encountered something of a domestic incident at the spot in question, with Mr Roberts acting in rather an enraged manner, it also appears that he was heavily intoxicated. The youths intervened*2 and Mr Roberts apparently turned his wrath upon them, this was when the single blow was placed upon the person of Mr Roberts who fell and struck his head resulting in his tragic death. The youth maintained that his action was self defence throughout.

There are very few Criminal Solicitors in West Wales, but the youth was represented by Paul Layton who is widely regarded as an excellent defence solicitor, although I do not know what Barrister was contracted to represent the youth at Swansea Crown Court, both Barrister and Solicitor were in agreement that there was no case to answer and that the prosecution was weak.

As events transpired, both youths have been acquitted by the jury, who took less than an hour to reach their unanimous verdict.

-----x-----

Both of the accused were held in custody from Early September until early December, will they
now be entitled to compensation?

I have experience of the Police attempting to discredit those that they are seeking to charge with an offence, it certainly appears that they again attempted to do so in this case.

What a complete waste of Public Money! Yet again!!

*1 The source of this 'version' of events came directly from the Police.

*2 Never get involved, call the Police if you feel strongly and let them sort it out, but when you do get involved personally in any incident your motives will be unimportant to the Police, they are only interested in getting 'detections' for their Performance Indicator's, they couldn't care less about how they achieve those detections!

1 comment:

Jack Gough said...

Strangely enough, in a roundabout way, you are acknowledging the 'police bloggers' are correct when they too claim that police are under pressure from "above" to meet targets or performance indicators.

I have no knowledge of the incident about which you speak, but the scenario of there being 3 sides to every story crops up quite regularly when it comes to policing.

At the end of the day the police have collated the evidence - including I presume interviews with both suspects.

If they have landed a fatal blow in self defence as you say, then it appears justice has been done.

That does not mean that police action taken is incorrect. At the end of the day the police are duty bound to report matters to the CPS or PF and put it through court - regardless of targets. Every sudden or suspicious death must be reported in that way.

I don't see why you think the decision to hold the 2 boys in custody on remand is the polices, because it is not. Nor is that to discredit them - in fact it ensures they could not discredit themselves by absconding!

As well you know there should be no compensation. If we compensated every remand prisoner who was found not guilty, there would be a serious drain on public funds and a lot of money being put back into criminality on the whole. And even an anti-police campaigner like you must agree that would not be a good thing.